I also discovered that you can use NX on an RPI4 for to provide a low cost smart terminal with responsiveness equal to running the same application on the local machine. My user base is a lot of video editing and NX is the only solution that works streaming SD and sometimes HD to a work from home environment. For that, anydesk is the best optional I've found so far.įor me, NX was necessary because it provides a high-speed high-quality Remote Desktop. I would not use no machine/NX for Remote IT/systems management. ![]() I know that they have planned NoMachine Network which will mean that IP addresses won't Then I imagine all the other solutions on the market will have a new competitor. Enterprise, of which Cloud Server is a product, is for businesses? But in a nutshell with Enterprise Desktop you get browser-based access, ssh support, unlimited connections to the physical desktop and automatic screen recording.Įrm free means free (provided you are not using it in a commercial environment). There's a clear comparison table on the website which shows the differences. Have you asked NoMachine these same questions? What is the difference between the free version and the Enterprise Desktop version? To me, there is no difference at all. Please convince me that it is worth looking at again :)Īre you just trolling or do you really want a sensible answer? I really want to like the software and service but I simply cannot understand why NM is even still a thing when (for example) the Anydesk offering is free, is easier to configure, doesn't need the prospect of port forwarding and works well though is a bit crap for business environments). Logging in - As far as I can tell I would need to create a hidden admin user on MS and Apple machines so that the end-user sees "PC Support" just connected rather than their own username. ![]() Ports - Seriously in this day and age you still need to forward ports on some routers to be able to use NM? Can someone please explain is idiot-proof terms the differences? I've toyed with NM in the past and like what I see but why do they make it so damn difficult to use?įirst off, the different packages. These APIs allow Guacamole to be tightly integrated into other applications, whether they be open source or proprietary.įor enterprises, dedicated commercial support is also available through third party companies.I am an MSP / remote support engineer with one employee (me) and about 300 endpoints (a mix of Microsoft and Apple) currently using a combination of Atera, free Splashtop via Atera, Teamviewer (rolling out) and AnyDesk (replacing with TV). We feel this sets us apart from other remote desktop solutions, and gives us a distinct advantage.Īpache Guacamole is built on its own stack of core APIs which are thoroughly documented, including basic tutorials and conceptual overviews in the online manual. It is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and is actively maintained by a community of developers that use Guacamole to access their own development environments. With both Guacamole and a desktop operating system hosted in the cloud, you can combine the convenience of Guacamole with the resilience and flexibility of cloud computing.Īpache Guacamole is and will always be free and open source software. ![]() ![]() As long as you have access to a web browser, you have access to your machines.ĭesktops accessed through Guacamole need not physically exist. Latest release: 1.5.3 (released on 10:40:06 -0700)īecause the Guacamole client is an HTML5 web application, use of your computers is not tied to any one device or location.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |